Helpful, Watchful Eyes Keep Us All In Check: An IEP Annual Review Checklist

A solid IEP annual review checklist covers three phases: gather current data and update the PLAAFP before the meeting, walk through goals and services with the team during it, and confirm signatures and next steps after. A second reviewer catching gaps in that paperwork before the meeting can help head off compliance problems before they grow into something bigger.
There's an old line about a rose smelling as sweet by any other name, and it's been on my mind since I went back to court last year to change my last name for the third time, after three marriages and one very thorough judge.

He wouldn't sign my Petition For Name Change until I gave him a complete list of every last name I'd ever used, back to childhood. Fair enough, once I thought about it. Most of that paperwork had been lost over the years, and photocopying it all would have cost more than the filing itself.

I made my case. He found a way to grant it anyway.
Finally I was legally Mary McLaughlin.
The Benefit of Second Looks for Special Educators
![]()
How many special education teachers do paperwork? There should be 100% of the hands in the air.
We complain about how much there is. We complain about the time it takes. We complain about meeting after meeting eating into our day, and about all the assessing that comes before any of it. But in the end, we know it's necessary. A child who comes to us in the fall will have made some kind of gain by May. Not a perfect gain, but a real one, and it's our job to document it.
At the intervals set in each student's IEP, we fire up our pens (or our keyboards) and document progress toward each goal. We send the progress reports the IEP requires. We keep in contact. We ask questions, listen to the answers, and take notes. We document, document, document. We put together what we believe is a well-written draft IEP.
Then we're told we don't have enough data in the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) statement.

At first that stings, because we thought we'd already done the legwork. Then we realize the reviewer is right. We write our Prior Written Notice, which some districts still call a Notice of Action, thinking the statements are smooth and accurately linked across every page of the file, and then we're shown exactly where it didn't link the way we thought it had.
In the end, that extra set of eyes on our paperwork can help identify gaps before they turn into larger compliance problems.
An IEP Annual Review Checklist You Can Actually Use
Most of the checklists floating around online are built for a district's internal workflow, not for the teacher trying to walk into the meeting prepared. Here's the version I actually use, broken into the three points where paperwork most often falls apart.
Before the Meeting
- Pull the current IEP and check progress against every goal, not just the ones that are obviously behind.
- Update the PLAAFP with real, dated data: work samples, running records, behavior logs, whatever you actually collected this year.
- Follow your state and district procedures for Prior Written Notice (PWN), including required timing.
- Confirm the required IEP team can participate, including the parent(s), a special education teacher/provider, a general education teacher when applicable, an LEA representative, and someone who can interpret evaluation results. Related-services personnel and other participants may be included as appropriate.
- Draft new goals ahead of time. Bring them as a starting point for discussion, not a finished decision.
During the Meeting
- Walk through present levels first, so everyone is looking at the same data before anyone talks about new goals.
- Cover progress on last year's goals honestly, including the ones that didn't go as planned.
- Set new goals as a team, specific enough that another teacher could pick up the IEP in September and know exactly what to measure.
- Review accommodations and services line by line. Don't carry one forward just because it was there last year.
After the Meeting
- Finalize the IEP and complete any signatures, acknowledgments, or consent forms required by your state or district.
- Make sure the IEP is accessible to every teacher and service provider responsible for implementing it, and that each one understands their specific responsibilities, not just the ones who were in the room.
- File the PWN with the rest of the paperwork. It's a piece a second reviewer often checks for first, because it's easy to forget.
So What's This Rose Called?
The names may vary, but the job responsibility stays the same: use the expertise you've built in special education, together with your state's rules and the federal requirements under IDEA, to make sure the paperwork holds up.
The role asks for equal parts special ed. teacher, the instincts of a lawyer, knowledge of district and state requirements, kindness, firmness, and an ability to stay organized well past the typical. I take real comfort in knowing someone is checking my work.
Titles and responsibilities vary considerably by state and district. The role may be called Due Process Designee, Special Education Designee, Special Education Director, or another locally defined position, and what's expected of the person holding it varies right along with the name. But a rose is a rose is a rose.
"Fear is a good thing. It means you're paying attention." --Tamora Pierce
Keeping everything balanced, every T crossed and every I dotted, is a real challenge. We are the special education teachers, and our title used to say it all. These days, the title only covers part of what the job actually asks of us.
Resources Worth Bookmarking
Getting organized for Annual Review season doesn't have to start from a blank page. Here's where I go when I want a second opinion on my own system:
- Pinterest has an abundance of tracking sheets for assessment, behavior, and progress data. You'll need to dig for what fits your caseload, but there's something here for most needs.
- Autism Classroom Resources is a solid hub for special education teachers of every stripe: training videos, an online academy, and visual walkthroughs of specific tools.
- NASET maintains a Power Point covering Annual Review responsibilities and meeting prep. Worth a skim even for veteran teachers.
- One district put together a checklist that's a useful starting point for building one that fits your own district's requirements.
- I like the specificity of this before-during-after tool. It even notes which specific people should receive which documents.
- This procedural checklist covers preparation, a meeting agenda, and a post-meeting to-do list. Easy to adapt to your own district.
- Teachers Pay Teachers has a wide range of resources to make your prep flow more smoothly.
- If video works better for you, Idea Basics: Annual Review covers the fundamentals in one sitting.
- Or try Preparing for the Annual Review (45 minutes) for a deeper walkthrough.
- And don't skip the obvious one: your district's own Special Education Services staff, who can tell you exactly what your specific meetings need to include.
Be Grateful, Be Proactive, Be Prepared

You've worked hard for the students in your special education classes this year. You've assessed, documented, monitored, and adjusted, and you've made every effort to meet the goals in each IEP.
Now is when you share the results of that work. This stretch of the year is busy for "our people," but it can still be a positive one as you walk the IEP team through what actually happened this year.
Everyone in that room has a stake in the student's success. If you're nervous about getting it exactly right, say so. Having been a building leader myself, I'd rather work with someone more concerned about accuracy than about being right.
You will do great.
Oh, and if I didn't mention it, I'm a bit nervous, too.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an IEP annual review checklist?
It's a working list of what needs to happen before, during, and after a student's yearly IEP meeting: updating present levels with real data, confirming the required team members, setting new goals together, and getting everything signed and distributed afterward. A written checklist keeps any one of those steps from getting skipped when your caseload is heavy.
Why does a second person reviewing my IEP paperwork matter?
A second reviewer catches the gaps you can't see in your own file, missing dates, a PLAAFP that doesn't quite support the proposed goals, a Prior Written Notice (sometimes called a Notice of Action, depending on your state or district) that doesn't link cleanly to the data behind it. Catching those before the meeting can help identify paperwork gaps before they become larger compliance issues.
What is a PLAAFP statement?
PLAAFP stands for Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance. It's the section of the IEP that documents where a student actually stands right now, using dated evidence like work samples, running records, and behavior data, and it's the foundation every new goal has to be built on.
How is an annual review different from a triennial review?
An IEP must be reviewed at least annually to check progress on current goals and adjust services. A reevaluation generally must happen at least once every three years, unless the parent and the public agency agree it isn't necessary, and its scope depends on the student's circumstances and existing data rather than always meaning a full new battery of testing. Both reviews share many of the same paperwork checks, but the triennial can add formal reassessment on top.
What happens if paperwork errors aren't caught before the meeting?
Small errors, like a goal that doesn't match the data or a missing PWN, can create compliance problems, and when they're significant enough, they may contribute to a due-process dispute or a finding that a student was denied a free appropriate public education. Catching them ahead of time with a second reviewer is far less stressful than untangling a dispute after the fact.
- A second reviewer can catch what you can't — extra eyes on your IEP paperwork before the meeting can help identify gaps before they become larger compliance issues.
- The PLAAFP needs real, dated data — work samples, running records, and behavior logs, not a summary written from memory.
- Confirm the required IEP team before you meet — the parent(s), a special education teacher/provider, a general education teacher when applicable, an LEA representative, and someone who can interpret evaluation results, with related-services personnel included as appropriate.
- Job titles and responsibilities vary by state and district — Due Process Designee, Special Education Designee, Special Education Director, or another locally defined role, each with its own scope.
Annual Review season is only one piece of building a long special education career. If you're weighing whether an advanced degree or an added endorsement would make caseload seasons like this one easier to manage, the programs featured on this page include special education tracks at both the master's and certificate level.
- The Pros and Cons of Being a Principal: An Honest Look - July 29, 2021
- Special Needs Prom: How One Student Led His School’s Grand March - April 20, 2021
- Behavior Management Training for Teachers: What to Ask For - October 9, 2020





